Fighting terrorism online is a relatively new and
controversial topic, especially after the released findings from Edward Snowden
and the warrant-less surveillance conducted by the NSA. One such problem that arises is the diversity
within the ISIS fighters themselves. The
number of foreign fighters that have joined terror groups continues to rise.
According to the The International Center for the Study of Radicalisation and
Political Violence or ICSR exceeds 20,000 fighters. (icsr.info/foreignfighter) France, Germany and the United Kingdom
produce the largest number of fighters. From
a cultural aspect the diversity within these terror groups has become difficult
to narrow down because of the melting pot of different ethnicities and cultures
their coming from. Many of these people
begin communicating and discussing ISIS propaganda online. The George Washington University based a
study on terrorist’s related arrests within the U.S. and the American
authorities have arrested nearly five dozen people in one year alone. “The individuals range from hardened
militants to teenage girls, petty criminals and college students,” said Lorenzo
Vidino, the director of the university’s program on extremism, which conducted
the study. “The diversity is staggering.” (cchs.gwu.edu)
With all these potential
risks the U.S. government is exploring different ideas and programs to establish
an algorithm that can detect possible ISIS targets and members of that
community. The U.S. government is
running between a fine line between surveillance on ISIS propaganda and the
warrantless surveillance that was leaked by Snowden a few years earlier. The government has started a program dubbed “Madison
Valleywood Project” in which American tech companies, media organization and PR
forms met behind closed doors with the Justice department. Finding common ground between National
Security and Invasion of Privacy has been a fragile topic. Many citizens view government surveillance as
not only unethical but illegal while members of the NSA view it as necessary to
protect them people and the country.
Within this gray area the government has proposed an algorithm that
determines a score for possible terrorist reported individuals. This possible solution has different flaws
that could affect the outcome of prosecuted cases. After the incident with Apple and the FBI
many tech companies have become weary of this upcoming ideas.
The American people have
grown discontent with the government over the NSA’s surveillance program that
was whistle blown by Snowden. I agree with the position in which these algorithmic
programs will cause more problems to the system and the integrity of the
country than help in locating terror suspects.
When Project Prism was released in which the NSA was gathering and
collecting bulk phone records many officials were curious of the success of the
Prism program. The director of the NSA
Gen. Keith Alexander claimed that the data collected from the NSA programs
helped prevent “dozen of terrorist events.”
However Sens. Ron Wyden and Mark Udall released a statement contradicting
Gen. Alexander’s comments. "Gen.
Alexander's testimony yesterday suggested that the NSA's bulk phone records
collection program helped thwart 'dozens' of terrorist attacks, but all of the
plots that he mentioned appear to have been identified using other collection
methods.” This two senators both serve
on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and have access to the nation’s
most sensitive secrets. Today many
possible terror attacks are thwarted by the use of informants. The American public are not privy to all the
information that top officials have access too.
From previous knowledge the NSA has abused surveillance on the American
people and as far as public knowledge these programs have had more controversy
than success. Why would an algorithm program
have higher success rates than the Prism program? When we allow the government more and more
access to our personal information, where do we as the American public draw the
line, and once we have begun down this road of 24/7 surveillance and big
brother watching what’s to stop them from gaining more explicit access.
Bergen,
Peter. "Did NSA Snooping Stop 'dozens' of Terrorist Attacks?" CNN.
Cable News Network, 18 June 2013. Web. 22 June 2016.
No comments:
Post a Comment